LIVE STATE EVOLUTION

Water/Oil/Synthetic-Based Mud Systems (HPHT Effects)

Model performance of different base mud systems under HP/HT conditions.

Request Demo >

Select the Right Mud System

Fluid system simulations help engineers assess viscosity, thermal stability, and compatibility under HPHT and contamination conditions. Operators can test mud types and treatment additives to maintain optimal rheology throughout operations. This proactive control improves wellbore stability, reduces losses, and ensures consistent performance across fluid transitions.

Core Capabilities

Base Fluid Comparison

Compare drilling fluid formulations for performance efficiency.

HPHT Viscosity Response

Analyze viscosity stability under extreme downhole conditions.

Thermal Stability Tracking

Monitor fluid properties under temperature cycling effects.

Benchmarks

OPERATIONAL COMPLEXITY
33
COMPUTATIONS PER SECOND
10,000
SIMULATION DURATION
1 Hour +

Run-Time Engine Utilization

FAQ

LIVE STATE EVOLUTION

How do we deploy and use this simulation in practice? What hardware tiers are supported?

Deploy on-prem, private cloud, or isolated networks. Supported hardware tiers: X1/X3 simulators, Laptop, and Online. Teams can also rent the Endeavor Experience Center for executive demos, assessments, or multi-crew exercises. Typical session: configure scenario parameters, run the study and or simulation sessions, review KPIs, and export results.

Can we import our own well data and tool parameters? Which formats and integrations are supported?

Yes. Import well data via WITSML 1.4/2.0 or CSV/JSON, or ingest parameters directly through DOT.  Any input from the field—well schematics, logs, tool states, rates/pressures—instantiates a real digital twin of the well for hyper-realistic training and operational planning (Drilling Well on Simulator).  APIs and versioned adapters are customized upon request.

How accurate is this model in real operations, and how do you handle validation and limits?

The model simulates water-, oil-, and synthetic-based mud systems under HPHT conditions by coupling temperature-dependent rheology, pressure response, and hydraulics rather than static lab values. Accuracy is strongest for comparing system behavior, ECD impact, and thermal effects as conditions change. Where fluid degradation or downhole variability dominates, outcomes are bounded with sensitivity ranges instead of a single predicted result.

What inputs and outputs does this simulation produce, and how do we export results?

Inputs typically include the operation configuration—well profile or trajectory, fluid properties, equipment and tool states, boundary conditions, and rate or pressure schedules. Outputs and KPIs capture the scenario’s hydraulic, mechanical, and fluid responses, including pressure and flow behavior across the system, evolving fluid properties, and equipment performance. Results also define , event detection, and time-based cause-and-effect responses to operator actions. Detailed datasets, replays, and assessment metrics can be exported for engineering review, training records, or planning documentation

What are the security, access control, and support expectations for enterprise deployment?

Enterprise deployments support role-based access control, secure authentication, and encryption of data in transit and at rest. The platform can be deployed on-premise, in private cloud, or in an isolated environment(s) to meet operational and regulatory requirements. Support is provided under defined SLA tiers, with controlled release management and long-term support options available for production environments.