Scale high-fidelity simulation without hardware lock-in
Managing long-lived infrastructure, our concern was lifecycle disruption. Hardware upgrades typically meant projects, revalidation, and downtime. In this case, performance improved as hardware evolved without re-architecting the system, making ownership predictable.
Executive Introduction
High-fidelity simulation platforms often impose long-term hardware dependency. As compute requirements grow, upgrades become disruptive, costly, and tightly coupled to the software itself. Over time, simulation infrastructure turns into technical debt: specialized processors, fragile integrations, and revalidation cycles that discourage improvement.
This case documents a materially different outcome. Endeavor’s runtime architecture achieved computational efficiency that allowed the platform to scale, upgrade, and evolve on standard CPU hardware—without architectural disruption, specialized processors, or costly re-platforming.
Organizational Context
This case involved organizations operating simulationsystems as long-lived infrastructure rather than short-term projects. Theseenvironments supported training, planning, and validation over multi-yearlifecycles, often across multiple facilities or deployments.
Historically, these organizations faced recurring frictionduring system evolution:
The cumulative effect was high total cost of ownership andorganizational reluctance to modernize.
How the System Was Used
Endeavor’s platform operated on standard, commercially available CPU hardware, eliminating the need for dedicated server racks used to partition operational workloads across approximately 20 racks spanning two servers. The simulation executed deterministically and continuously within the available compute envelope.
Over time, hardware components—processors, memory, and storage—were upgraded incrementally as part of normal IT refresh cycles. No changes were made to the simulation architecture. No model redesign was required. No unrelated behaviors were revalidated.
Software updates were applied independently of hardware upgrades. As CPU performance improved, simulation performance improved automatically. The system remained operational throughout upgrade cycles, avoiding downtime associated with re-platforming.
Characterization of the Structural Change
Many simulation platforms encode performance assumptions directly into their architecture. As a result:
Endeavor took a different approach.
By prioritizing computational efficiency at the architectural level, the platform decoupled simulation fidelity from hardware specificity. Performance scaled naturally with processor improvements rather than architectural change. Hardware evolution became an asset rather than a risk.
This is not an optimization strategy. It is a lifecycle strategy.
“Upgrades stopped being a project.”
Value Captured & Realized
Knowledge and Insight
Organizations gained confidence that simulation performance was not tied to a fixed hardware configuration. Long-term planning uncertainty around obsolescence, scalability, and vendor lock-in was eliminated.
Simulation infrastructure could now be treated like standard enterprise compute rather than specialized equipment.
Operational Impact
Hardware refresh cycles became routine instead of disruptive. Systems were upgraded during standard maintenance windows without retraining users, revalidating unrelated scenarios, or halting operations.
Across deployments, hardware upgrade timelines were reduced by an estimated 50–70% compared to legacy simulation platforms.
Cost and Risk Implication
By avoiding specialized processors and proprietary hardware, organizations significantly reduced capital expenditure and ongoing support costs. Incremental CPU upgrades typically cost tens of thousands of dollars, rather than hundreds of thousands for specialized systems.
Over a typical 5–7 year lifecycle, this translated into hundreds of thousands to low millions USD in avoided re-platforming, integration, and validation costs per deployment.
Equally important, organizations avoided the operational risk of stagnating on outdated hardware due to upgrade friction.
Established Outcome
High-fidelity simulation does not require exotic hardware. It requires efficient architecture. This case established that Endeavor’s platform evolves seamlessly with commodity compute, preserving fidelity, stability, and continuity as hardware improves.
Closing Perspective
Hardware will change. Software that cannot adapt will accumulate cost and risk. This case establishes Endeavor’s platform as one that benefits from hardware progress rather than being threatened by it—turning system evolution into a predictable, low-risk process instead of a disruptive event.
Back to Case Studies