Primary Cement Job Design (Densities, Spacers, Centralization)
Model cement job parameters to optimize zonal isolation and well integrity.
Request Demo >
Design for Long-Term Integrity
Spacer design simulations assess mud removal and density sequencing during cementing. Engineers can test centralizer placement and flow regimes for uniform displacement. The outcome is higher bond quality, reduced gas migration, and improved long-term well integrity.
Core Capabilities
Spacer Design Modeling
Optimize spacer formulation to prevent contamination zones.
Centralization Analysis
Evaluate casing alignment for uniform cement coverage.
Density Sequencing
Plan fluid density stages preventing pressure surges.
Benchmarks
Run-Time Engine Utilization
FAQ
CEMENTING
Deploy on-prem, private cloud, or isolated networks. Supported hardware tiers: X1/X2/X3 simulators, Laptop, and Online. Teams can also rent the Endeavor Experience Center for executive demos, assessments, or multi-crew exercises. Typical session: configure scenario parameters, run the study and or simulation sessions, review KPIs, and export results.
Yes. Import well data via WITSML 1.4/2.0 or CSV/JSON, or ingest parameters directly through DOT. Any input from the field—well schematics, logs, tool states, rates/pressures—instantiates a real digital twin of the well for hyper-realistic training and operational planning (Drilling Well on Simulator). APIs and versioned adapters are customized upon request.
This simulation models spacer and cement transport, displacement efficiency, and pressure/flow behavior through the annulus using physics-based wellbore hydraulics and fluid property evolution (density, rheology, and temperature where applicable). The run-time engine accepts real-time operational inputs—pump schedules, fluid trains, tool states, centralizer layouts, and geometry changes—to reproduce equipment behavior and the dynamic response of the system deterministically. Outputs can be compared to field observations (pressures, returns, volumes, ECD trends, and displacement signatures) to tune parameters and build a job-specific “gold standard” scenario for training, planning, and what-if testing.
Inputs typically include the operation configuration—well profile or trajectory, fluid properties, equipment and tool states, boundary conditions, and rate or pressure schedules. Outputs and KPIs capture the scenario’s hydraulic, mechanical, and fluid responses, including pressure and flow behavior across the system, evolving fluid properties, and equipment performance. Results also define , event detection, and time-based cause-and-effect responses to operator actions. Detailed datasets, replays, and assessment metrics can be exported for engineering review, training records, or planning documentation; see the full output list for complete coverage.
Enterprise deployments support role-based access control, secure authentication, and encryption of data in transit and at rest. The platform can be deployed on-premise, in private cloud, or in an isolated environment(s) to meet operational and regulatory requirements. Support is provided under defined SLA tiers, with controlled release management and long-term support options available for production environments.